Software Design Principle: Iteration over Perfection
Iterative Mindset Helps You Go Further
In my software engineering approach, I prioritize iterative development over striving for perfection from the start. While some engineers aim for a flawless solution encompassing all possible scenarios, I don't see that as inherently negative. However, I do think circumstances may not always unfold as expected, potentially leading to misguided resource investments, especially in a dynamic environment.
My preference for an iterative approach is rooted in its ability to design solutions that meet current business needs while emphasizing simplicity. This simplicity allows for quick adaptations during subsequent iterations, taking advantage of the expansive design space. The iterative process also enables me to gather real feedback from production usage, facilitating meaningful optimizations based on actual needs. Upon receiving feedback, I can enhance the solution, aligning it more closely with real-world requirements.
Additionally, the iterative design minimizes risks in software engineering management through its ability to promptly identify and address potential issues early in the process. As a result, the overall risk associated with the project is diminished. Collecting feedback from actual production usage enables swift adjustments with minimal effort, given the straightforward and easily modifiable nature of the solution.
On the flip side, a perfective design hinges on anticipating the majority of needs, which may not materialize as expected. This can result in added complexities and resource investments prior to the system going live. Such additional efforts can adversely affect the time-to-market, as more time is devoted to the solution. Moreover, if design modifications are required after going live, it could prove challenging since the unknown factors might not have been thoroughly considered in the initial design.
Embracing a perfect design mindset may result in inaccurate predictions of future requirements, potentially leading to the misallocation of resources. Subsequent corrections and adjustments may be necessary as the initially anticipated business needs might differ from the actual ones. There is a risk of expending resources on refining solutions based on inaccurate predictions instead of addressing genuine business requirements.
What you envision as the end might not be the final outcome; there are numerous possibilities within your business.
Your design should not impose constraints on the business; instead, it should reserve flexibility to foster the expansion of business possibilities. Adopting a perfective design mindset may involve defining the business's end goal, but in reality, business requirements evolve over time. Therefore, the design should be adaptable to the evolving needs of the business, as facilitated by the iterative mindset.
To address this issue, my approach involves establishing a precise priority for the current business need and concentrating solely on the present without attempting to predict future needs. By adopting this strategy, I aim to reserve more design space for future iterations while optimizing the utilization of team resources. This ensures a more flexible and adaptive development process, allowing for effective adjustments based on real and evolving business needs.
In conclusion, my software engineering philosophy centers on finding a balance between adaptability and precision, ensuring efficient resource utilization and effective adjustments based on real-world business needs.
Thanks for reading Awesome Software Engineer! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.